Energy & comfort
Orientation, shade and the building envelope considered together with ventilation and thermal comfort.
I see sustainability as part of architectural quality: responding to climate, using resources thoughtfully and creating places that are comfortable to inhabit.
My approach connects design intuition with evidence — from the first brief to the way a building performs in use.
How I connect design and evidence ↓
The starting point is the site, its climate and the people who will use it. These priorities become questions that the design team can test.
Orientation, shade and the building envelope considered together with ventilation and thermal comfort.
Useful natural light, views and glare control that support the everyday experience of a space.
Material quantities, durability and life-cycle impacts assessed alongside architectural character.
Rainfall, permeable surfaces and planting considered as connected parts of the site.
RIBA gives the work its structure. LEED translates sustainability ambitions into criteria. BIM provides coordinated information for analysis.
Agree responsibilities, deliverables and review points at each project stage.
For projects pursuing certification, select requirements, targets and the evidence needed.
Coordinate geometry, properties and quantities so specialists can test the same design options.
Architecture, structure, building services and sustainability specialists review the evidence together and repeat the analysis when the design changes.
Reference standards and editions depend on the selected assessment and LEED pathway. A model or internal stage approval does not by itself establish certification.
Examples of how the approach can be applied. The questions below describe an assessment method; they do not claim verified project performance.

Compare glazing and shading options using solar exposure, daylight and thermal analysis. Review the balance between light, views and cooling demand.
View project ↗
Use site areas and levels with local rainfall and soil data to compare paving, planting and retention options before selecting a solution.
View project ↗Professional learning and published research inform the approach. Technical requirements are checked against the pathway selected for each project.
Heat, daylight, energy and building-performance analysis.
Urban development, liveability and sustainability.
Urban heat and context-sensitive cooling strategies.
A stormwater management concept for Baku.
Connecting environmental design with everyday comfort.
Research on growth, land use and green spaces.
Depending on the selected project pathway: ASHRAE methods for energy and thermal comfort, IES methods for daylight, life-cycle assessment and environmental product declarations for materials, and local hydrological data for rainwater analysis. Required editions and applicability must be checked for each assessment.
ISO 19650 supports information management. Analysis requires appropriate geometry, material and system properties, documented assumptions, current revisions and a clear record of who checked the inputs. More geometric detail does not automatically mean better evidence.
This is a proposed integration of RIBA, LEED and BIM, not an official crosswalk. BIM provides inputs rather than proof of compliance. Stage approval and independent certification are separate processes; actual performance must be measured.
Official references behind the methodology. Verify the applicable LEED edition, addenda and compliance path for every project.